EU Stablecoin Alarm: 99% USD Peg Spurs Call for Euro-Backed Alternatives
The European Central Bank (ECB) and European Union policymakers are staring down an uncomfortable financial truth: 99% of global stablecoins are denominated in U.S. dollars. That overwhelming imbalance doesn’t just reflect market preference—it signals a strategic vulnerability for the eurozone. As blockchain technology reshapes how money moves, the question isn’t whether the euro will be digitized, but whether it will remain relevant in the emerging tokenized financial system.
Stablecoins—digital tokens pegged to fiat currencies—have rapidly become the bedrock of crypto markets, decentralized finance (DeFi), and cross-border payments. Their utility spans from remittances to tokenized treasury markets, and increasingly, traditional financial institutions are getting involved. Yet, despite Europe’s leadership in regulatory frameworks through MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets), euro-backed stablecoins remain nearly invisible on the global stage.
In early July 2025, Lorenzo Bini Smaghi, former ECB board member and current chair of Société Générale, sounded the alarm: Europe risks losing financial sovereignty if it fails to aggressively support euro-denominated stablecoins. His comments come amid ECB warnings about monetary fragmentation and calls from industry leaders for a hybrid public-private solution to defend the euro’s place in the digital financial order.
This article explores what’s driving the euro’s absence in stablecoin markets, the regulatory and political friction slowing progress, and what’s at stake for Europe’s future as other global powers race ahead.
The USD Dominance in Stablecoins
The rise of dollar-backed stablecoins is no accident. From Tether (USDT) to USD Coin (USDC), these tokens offer deep liquidity, fast settlement, and global familiarity. Even in emerging markets, where U.S. dollars are not legal tender, dollar-pegged stablecoins serve as de facto digital cash. They are trusted, accessible, and readily integrated into major exchanges and protocols.
Europe’s equivalent? Almost nonexistent. The most prominent euro-denominated stablecoin, EURT (Tether’s euro version), accounts for less than 1% of global stablecoin volume. Others like Stasis’ EURS or Angle Protocol’s agEUR have failed to gain significant traction, constrained by fragmented regulation, limited integrations, and insufficient liquidity.
This asymmetry has consequences. The dollar’s digital dominance reinforces its role in global finance. Every time a European institution, trader, or protocol uses a dollar-backed stablecoin, it boosts U.S. monetary influence. In crisis scenarios, the ECB has little oversight or intervention capacity in a system where euro transactions are executed using foreign-issued, foreign-law-governed instruments.
The irony? Europe has stronger digital financial regulations than any major power. MiCA sets the gold standard for stablecoin governance, demanding capital buffers, regular audits, redemption guarantees, and clear disclosures. Yet regulation alone isn’t enough to drive adoption. Without incentives, infrastructure, and clear strategic commitment, euro stablecoins remain sidelined.
ECB vs EC: Diverging Approaches
The debate within Europe is far from unified. On one hand, the European Commission emphasizes integration, interoperability, and the value stablecoins could bring to everyday users and institutions. On the other, the ECB worries that these innovations may trap Europe in a foreign-dominated digital trap.
In late June 2025, President Christine Lagarde called for swift legislative action to launch the digital euro, warning that privately issued stablecoins pose risks to monetary policy, financial stability, and public trust. She pointed specifically to incidents like the collapse of TerraUSD in 2022 as evidence that so-called stable coins may suddenly lose their peg. Lagarde also highlighted the need for cohesive regulation, noting that fragmented oversight creates potential vulnerabilities. Tether, for instance, operates from El Salvador under a light regulatory regime.
The European Commission, for its part, is leaning toward harmonizing token flows across the EU. In June 2025, Brussels clarified that EU-issued stablecoins should be fungible regardless of whether they’re minted by EU-licensed entities or by sister companies abroad. While intended to boost market liquidity and pan-European use, this decision runs against the ECB’s core concern: non-residents might redeem euro-backed tokens, drawing from euro-area reserves without reciprocal oversight—undermining monetary sovereignty and ECB influence over systemic liquidity.
This tension reveals deeper philosophical differences. The Commission opts for a user-centric, cross-border payments vision: open, accessible and unified. The ECB prioritizes stability and control, insisting on safeguards and limits to ward off capital flight and systemic instability.
That rift extends to the digital euro as well. Lagarde has urged lawmakers to expedite legislation for a digital euro as a strategic counterbalance to private stablecoins. She describes it as vital for Europe’s financial autonomy, yet progress has stalled amid political pushback and banks’ concerns about losing deposits to a central-bank wallet. Banks estimate potential disruption costs between €18 billion and €30 billion.
Europe thus hangs in a strategic limbo: will it let private stablecoin innovation run ahead, guided by liberal market sentiment? Or will it double down on sovereignty via public instruments? The verdict will shape whether the euro thrives—or fades—in tomorrow’s digital era.
Policy and Strategic Recommendations
A growing chorus of experts suggests Europe must pair its robust regulatory framework with bold, strategic action. Bini Smaghi’s prescription is clear: rather than restrict stablecoins, Europe should actively foster euro-denominated ones, especially by central banks and leading banks. He asserts the ECB already possesses both the institutional power and technological means to champion euro stablecoins—this could align public mandates with private innovation and set clearer issuance standards.
The Digital Euro Association echoes this perspective, calling for a public‑private collaboration aimed at maintaining monetary sovereignty and advancing secure, interoperable payment systems. They recommend balanced regulatory refinement of MiCA to reduce red tape while preserving high standards, targeted public subsidies for token infrastructure projects, and collective issuance consortia to pool risk and resources.
In parallel, ECB executives like Piero Cipollone advocate leveraging the digital euro as a cornerstone of this partnership. He emphasizes that the ECB must accelerate implementation, aiming for a resilient, pan-European digital currency that deters deposit flight and strengthens euro stability.
Other policy threads include harmonizing MiCA’s licensing across member states to erase green tape and ambiguity for issuers, establishing an EU-level crypto sandbox to pilot stablecoin use cases, and investing in interoperable infrastructure. Europe must also lead global regulatory coordination efforts through the G7, BIS, and other international bodies to shape emerging norms rather than follow them.
By implementing these strategies, Europe would not only safeguard its monetary autonomy but also unlock stablecoin-powered innovation in payments, capital markets, and public finance.
Digital Euro vs. Private Stablecoins
Europe’s central bank–issued digital euro and private euro stablecoins aren’t locked in a binary rivalry. Instead, they are complementary layers in a modern, multi-tiered monetary ecosystem. Think of them like physical cash and mobile banking—they address different use cases and coexist effectively.
The digital euro is designed as a public good: issued directly by the ECB, it would enjoy legal tender status, strong privacy safeguards, and widespread acceptance at the point of sale. Its offline payment capability and simplicity make it ideal for everyday consumer use, offering universal access without the risk of private issuer default.
Private euro stablecoins, on the other hand, are built for programmability. These tokens can fuel complex use cases like cross-border B2B settlements, embedded finance, and DeFi integrations. They offer sophisticated features digital euros do not, such as smart-contract–driven payment logic and deeper system interoperability.
Regulatory frameworks reinforce this layered model. Under MiCA, private issuers must meet strict reserve, capital, and audit standards—yet cannot attain legal tender. Conversely, the digital euro will be sovereign-money backed and legally recognized. This ensures a balance: innovation and stability walking hand-in-hand.
Still, risks arise. If private stablecoins scale rapidly without public alternatives, they could erode the banking system and challenge monetary policy effectiveness. That’s precisely why the ECB is designing the digital euro to complement rather than replace these tokens—limiting its value per wallet, enforcing privacy, and shielding bank deposits from disruptive flight.
The emerging blueprint is a deliberate hybrid ecosystem, where private stablecoins provide programmability, flexibility, and integration with emerging financial tools, and the digital euro guarantees trust, sovereign backing, and universal public access.
ChatGPT said:
Global Context: How Other Regions Respond
As Europe deliberates its path, other regions are actively defining their approaches to stablecoins and CBDCs.
The United Kingdom is preparing comprehensive frameworks to regulate stablecoins. The Treasury and the Financial Conduct Authority are aiming for legislation within months. The UK is also building a digital securities sandbox, enabling firms to test tokenized assets in a regulated setting. Although the Bank of England has been cautious, it has signaled openness under stringent compliance conditions.
In the Middle East, Bahrain has launched a detailed Stablecoin Issuance and Offering Module. It requires full reserves, minimum capital, cybersecurity standards, and even Shariah compliance for yield-bearing stablecoins. The UAE has granted regulatory approval to dirham-backed stablecoins, integrating them into its payment ecosystem.
Singapore and Hong Kong have taken structured approaches. Singapore formalized its stablecoin rules in 2023, while Hong Kong regulators have issued consultations on stablecoin issuer licensing. These frameworks provide clarity and credibility while enabling fintech innovation.
Other jurisdictions—from South Korea and Brazil to Switzerland and the Eastern Caribbean—are running CBDC pilots tailored to their own economies. These initiatives show that digital currency leadership is now global, not limited to Western finance hubs.
What’s at Stake for European Stakeholders
European policymakers, banks, fintechs, payment providers, and citizens all have powerful stakes in the stablecoin and digital euro landscape.
For regulators and central banks, the primary risk is erosion of monetary sovereignty. Policymakers have warned that U.S.-backed stablecoins may pose a greater threat to European economies than trade tariffs. The risk of dollarisation in the digital domain is very real.
Financial stability is also at the center. A loss of confidence in stablecoin issuers could trigger panic-like behavior, while the migration of deposits to foreign token platforms could diminish the ECB’s ability to manage liquidity.
Commercial banks face profit and liquidity risks. If consumers move en masse to digital euros or foreign stablecoins, banks could lose deposit funding. That, in turn, affects their ability to lend and stay profitable.
Fintechs and payment providers stand to benefit. Stablecoins and a digital euro could power new products in loyalty, e-commerce, and DeFi. But they need clearer incentives, regulatory certainty, and infrastructure access.
Consumers benefit from better payment security, privacy, and financial inclusion. A well-designed digital euro provides an alternative to commercial surveillance-based finance, and ensures access to risk-free money in digital form.
Societally, this is about economic independence. In a digitized world, Europe must own its monetary rails—lest they be shaped and governed elsewhere.
EU Stablecoin Alarm: 99% USD Peg Spurs Call for Euro-Backed Alternatives
Europe stands at a pivotal moment. With 99% of stablecoins denominated in U.S. dollars, the euro is being sidelined in a financial revolution. Europe is well-positioned to lead, with MiCA, the ECB’s groundwork on the digital euro, and a growing ecosystem of fintech innovators.
Yet hesitation, regulatory fragmentation, and internal disagreements are holding the euro back. Without euro stablecoins and a fully implemented digital euro, Europe’s monetary autonomy and digital relevance could be compromised.
A hybrid model—combining a sovereign, low-value public digital euro with interoperable private stablecoins—offers a balanced way forward. It can enable innovation, protect consumers, and defend the euro’s role in a rapidly changing financial system.
The roadmap exists. Now, Europe must act—decisively and collaboratively—to ensure the euro thrives, not fades, in the digital age.
